Dr PRANOY BARUA.
PRINCESS OF WALES HOSPITAL, BRIDGEND.
STATED THAT HE HAD IDENTIFIED AMPHETAMINES IN MUM,QUESTIONED POISONING,AND WISHED TO CHECK TOXICOLOGY.- ( 18 MONTHS AFTER DEATH)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
PRINCESS OF WALES HOSPITAL, BRIDGEND.
STATED THAT HE HAD IDENTIFIED AMPHETAMINES IN MUM,QUESTIONED POISONING,AND WISHED TO CHECK TOXICOLOGY.- ( 18 MONTHS AFTER DEATH)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
HE HAD ACTUALLY BEEN ATTEMPTING TO DIAGNOSE THE CAUSE OF DEBILITATING,HARMFUL SEDATION IN MUM,BY REDUCING/STOPPING PAIN RELIEF MEDICATION ETC-- WHICH WAS READILY EXPLAINED AFTER SEVERAL MONTHS BY A CARING,COMMUNICATIVE NURSE, READILY AND REPEATEDLY VOLUNTEERING THE INFORMATION THAT MUM WAS BEING SEDATED AT UNKNOWN TIMES/FREQUENCY/DOSAGE AT NIGHT, WITH ‘ ZOPICLONE ‘ MEDICATION.--- NOT PRESCRIBED,NOR RECORDED.
DR PRANOY BARUA’S SHOCKING REVELATION OF IDENTIFYING AMPHETAMINES,EXPLAINED WHY MUM HAD BEEN TRANSFORMED, -- FROM COMPLETELY COMATOSE, ----- REQUIRING URGENT INTRAVENOUS FLUIDS, ---- TO, A FEW HOURS LATER, BEING AS BRIGHT AS A BUTTON,-- MORE ALERT
THAN SHE HAD BEEN FOR MANY YEARS.!
AS EXPECTED,ABMU MANAGERS COMPLETELY CENSORED ALL DR PRANOY BARUA’S STATEMENT.( along with my recorded comments). ----- BUT THE VERY IMPORTANT QUESTION THAT NEEDS ANSWERING, IS,--- WAS THIS THE FIRST TIME THAT DR PRANOY BARUA HAD RAISED HIS CONCERNS ?
--- AS THE IMPLIED POISONING OF MUM WITH AMPHETAMINES IS A SERIOUS CRIMINAL OFFENCE.--- WHERE BOTH ABMU HEALTH BOARD MANAGERS AND THE POLICE SHOULD HAVE BEEN PROMPTLY INFORMED,--- WERE THEY?, --- AND IF SO,IS THIS THE REASON THAT AT LEAST ONE NURSE LOST EMPLOYMENT?
--- HOW COULD ABMU HEALTH BOARD MANAGERS FALSIFY OFFICIAL POVA RECORDS,--- WHEN SW POLICE WERE PRESENT? ----- MANAGER FIONA REYNOLDS HAD ALREADY MODIFIED/ ALTERED DOCTOR BARUA’S ORIGINAL ADVICE WITH REGARD TO TOXICOLOGY RESULTS,--- AND EVEN IN THIS SECOND POVA MEETING,SHE CONTINUED TO GIVE FALSE INFORMATION UPON DRUG TREATMENT EFFECTS OF ZOPICLONE,--- STATING THAT SHE STILL WISHED TO SPEAK TO MY FAMILY WITNESS.! -- BUT OF COURSE NEVER INTENDING TO DO SO,--- SUCH ARROGANT CONTEMPT FOR TRUTH , DISPLAYING A TOTAL INTEGRITY BYPASS.
JUST AS SHOCKING AND OF GREAT CONCERN FOR ALL VULNERABLE PATIENTS AND CARER’S / FAMILY,IS THE FACT THAT DETECTIVE SERGEANT DS 4179 ALSO SUBMITTED AN ENTIRELY FALSE STATEMENT OF THE POVA MEETING.--- WHICH COVERED UP HER TOTAL FAILURE TO PERFORM HER DUTIES AS A PUBLIC PROTECTION OFFICER.!
A FURTHER MEETING WITH DI 4015. S.SIDFORD HEAD OF THE PUBLIC PROTECTION UNIT OF SOUTH WALES POLICE,
PRODUCED THE CLEAR CONFIRMATION OF THE CRIMINAL OFFENCE OF ADMINISTERING AMPHETAMINES TO A VULNERABLE OAP HOSPITAL DEMENTIA PATIENT.(OBVIOUSLY)
--- BUT THE CLEAR STATEMENT THAT NO FURTHER ACTION WAS CONSIDERED BY SW POLICE.!
THAN SHE HAD BEEN FOR MANY YEARS.!
AS EXPECTED,ABMU MANAGERS COMPLETELY CENSORED ALL DR PRANOY BARUA’S STATEMENT.( along with my recorded comments). ----- BUT THE VERY IMPORTANT QUESTION THAT NEEDS ANSWERING, IS,--- WAS THIS THE FIRST TIME THAT DR PRANOY BARUA HAD RAISED HIS CONCERNS ?
--- AS THE IMPLIED POISONING OF MUM WITH AMPHETAMINES IS A SERIOUS CRIMINAL OFFENCE.--- WHERE BOTH ABMU HEALTH BOARD MANAGERS AND THE POLICE SHOULD HAVE BEEN PROMPTLY INFORMED,--- WERE THEY?, --- AND IF SO,IS THIS THE REASON THAT AT LEAST ONE NURSE LOST EMPLOYMENT?
--- HOW COULD ABMU HEALTH BOARD MANAGERS FALSIFY OFFICIAL POVA RECORDS,--- WHEN SW POLICE WERE PRESENT? ----- MANAGER FIONA REYNOLDS HAD ALREADY MODIFIED/ ALTERED DOCTOR BARUA’S ORIGINAL ADVICE WITH REGARD TO TOXICOLOGY RESULTS,--- AND EVEN IN THIS SECOND POVA MEETING,SHE CONTINUED TO GIVE FALSE INFORMATION UPON DRUG TREATMENT EFFECTS OF ZOPICLONE,--- STATING THAT SHE STILL WISHED TO SPEAK TO MY FAMILY WITNESS.! -- BUT OF COURSE NEVER INTENDING TO DO SO,--- SUCH ARROGANT CONTEMPT FOR TRUTH , DISPLAYING A TOTAL INTEGRITY BYPASS.
JUST AS SHOCKING AND OF GREAT CONCERN FOR ALL VULNERABLE PATIENTS AND CARER’S / FAMILY,IS THE FACT THAT DETECTIVE SERGEANT DS 4179 ALSO SUBMITTED AN ENTIRELY FALSE STATEMENT OF THE POVA MEETING.--- WHICH COVERED UP HER TOTAL FAILURE TO PERFORM HER DUTIES AS A PUBLIC PROTECTION OFFICER.!
A FURTHER MEETING WITH DI 4015. S.SIDFORD HEAD OF THE PUBLIC PROTECTION UNIT OF SOUTH WALES POLICE,
PRODUCED THE CLEAR CONFIRMATION OF THE CRIMINAL OFFENCE OF ADMINISTERING AMPHETAMINES TO A VULNERABLE OAP HOSPITAL DEMENTIA PATIENT.(OBVIOUSLY)
--- BUT THE CLEAR STATEMENT THAT NO FURTHER ACTION WAS CONSIDERED BY SW POLICE.!
FURTHER INVESTIGATION.
--AFTER THE SHOCKING SUSPENSION AND PROSECUTION OF SEVERAL ABMU HEALTH BOARD NURSES FOLLOWING THE
‘ TRUSTED TO CARE REVIEW ‘ OF PROF. JUNE ANDREWS COMMISSIONED BY THE WELSH ASSEMBLY GOVERNMENT ,A FURTHER,FOLLOW UP COMPLAINT I MADE TO SW POLICE, RESULTED IN A PROLONGED 6 MONTH INVESTIGATION BY DETECTIVE INSPECTOR RALPH HARRIS DI.4656,-- HE CONCLUDED THAT IT WAS NOT WITHIN HIS REMIT,NOR THE REMIT OF SW POLICE TO EVEN SPEAK WITH DR.PRANOY BARUA ABOUT HIS CONCERNS OF PATIENT POISONING WITH AMPHETAMINES. ! ----- ALL THE OFFICERS INVOLVED IN EXAMINING MY CONCERNS ARE MEMBERS THE PUBLIC PROTECTION UNIT OF SW POLICE.
AFTER BEING ASKED TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT TO SW POLICE, OFFICERS DI.3979 TRUDI MEYRICK, AND DC. KAREN MERRETT REMOVED THE MAJORITY OF MY SIGNED/WITNESSED POLICE STATEMENT WHICH THEY HAD PRODUCED AT COWBRIDGE POLICE STATION,LEAVING ONLY 2 PAGES REMAINING, ( OF 13 TOTAL).WHICH THEY PRODUCED AS MY RECORDED STATEMENT. ! THEIR DECEPTION IN SUCH A MANNER SHOULD RAISE SERIOUS CONCERN REGARDING THE OPERATION METHODS OF OUR POLICE PUBLIC PROTECTION OFFICERS. ----- JUST WHO DO THEY REPRESENT ?
CERTAINLY NOT THE VULNERABLE PERSON, AT RISK OF ABUSE.
‘ TRUSTED TO CARE REVIEW ‘ OF PROF. JUNE ANDREWS COMMISSIONED BY THE WELSH ASSEMBLY GOVERNMENT ,A FURTHER,FOLLOW UP COMPLAINT I MADE TO SW POLICE, RESULTED IN A PROLONGED 6 MONTH INVESTIGATION BY DETECTIVE INSPECTOR RALPH HARRIS DI.4656,-- HE CONCLUDED THAT IT WAS NOT WITHIN HIS REMIT,NOR THE REMIT OF SW POLICE TO EVEN SPEAK WITH DR.PRANOY BARUA ABOUT HIS CONCERNS OF PATIENT POISONING WITH AMPHETAMINES. ! ----- ALL THE OFFICERS INVOLVED IN EXAMINING MY CONCERNS ARE MEMBERS THE PUBLIC PROTECTION UNIT OF SW POLICE.
AFTER BEING ASKED TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT TO SW POLICE, OFFICERS DI.3979 TRUDI MEYRICK, AND DC. KAREN MERRETT REMOVED THE MAJORITY OF MY SIGNED/WITNESSED POLICE STATEMENT WHICH THEY HAD PRODUCED AT COWBRIDGE POLICE STATION,LEAVING ONLY 2 PAGES REMAINING, ( OF 13 TOTAL).WHICH THEY PRODUCED AS MY RECORDED STATEMENT. ! THEIR DECEPTION IN SUCH A MANNER SHOULD RAISE SERIOUS CONCERN REGARDING THE OPERATION METHODS OF OUR POLICE PUBLIC PROTECTION OFFICERS. ----- JUST WHO DO THEY REPRESENT ?
CERTAINLY NOT THE VULNERABLE PERSON, AT RISK OF ABUSE.
